6 Comments
User's avatar
Jonas Tjellesen's avatar

Great as always Peter. Thanks for the insights

Expand full comment
Peter Garnry, CFA's avatar

Thanks Jonas

Expand full comment
100x Farmer's avatar

You likely receive hundreds of pitches.

This isn’t one of them.

Hello @Peter Garnry, CFA,

Respect for what you have built here.

I am the Founder and Steward of the 100x Farm.

The 100x Farm is a quiet strategy sanctuary for investors and capital stewards with long memories and longer horizons.

No noise. No dopamine. No trend-chasing. 

Just deep-cycle clarity earned slowly, shared rarely.

We don’t believe in inbox conquest.

But if the idea of sowing $10,000 seeds to harvest $1 million trees over 20- 30 years feels familiar,

you and your patrons may already belong here.

What if the next 100x isn’t a stock but a forgotten business model or strategy hiding in plain sight?

Every thesis is backed by real capital, filtered through over 100 long-cycle lenses before it earns a word.

And if nothing else, this may help you filter what isn’t worth your time.

No urgency. No ask.

Only Signal.

Should you, or your patrons, choose to engage, our farm door remains open.

Warmly,

The 100x Farmer

Expand full comment
Anders Nielsen's avatar

Congratulations on realizing the new equity fund.

Reading your post got me thinking that there is a controversy between your primary take away about seeking new knowledge... to be an original thinker in investments and your example of inverting the DCF calculations by using averaged estimates. Using average estimates will probably give you consensus estimates for the stock, but at the same time stop you from applying original thinking to the future of the investment. So maybe there is no alternatives from applying your own expectations for the future based on hard knowledge of the firms and businesses?

Expand full comment
Peter Garnry, CFA's avatar

Thanks Anders.

Really good observation but the devil is in the details. The inversion of the DCF model gives you the market equilibrium of expectations. If implemented correctly the bias is as low as possible. Now, your job, as an independent thinker, is to figure out whether the company can exceed those expectations.

So in the Coca-Cola example Munger actually gets expectations wrong as judged from his prediction and extrapolation of past experience.

Expand full comment
Anders Nielsen's avatar

Thanks for staying open minded. There's some really good take aways in your post and I do believe that the aspirering of avoiding losses is the primary road to succes i investing.

Currently I am reading "Richer, Wiser, Happier" by William Green and find that every chapter is packed with the best thinking of the worlds best investors in a life time including Charles Munger. Though I only have modest savings, I believe the intellectual framework can bear the rewards in many parts of life.

I am looking foreward to your hopefully coming interesting posts if you get the time apart from your new equity fund.

Expand full comment